Leadership

, , , , , , , ,

How a Board Chair Can Set First-Year Actionable KPIs for a New CEO

Actionable KPIs

When a new CEO steps into a nonprofit leadership role, the first year is both a learning period and a critical time for building momentum. One of the most important responsibilities of the Board Chair is to provide clarity, direction, and measurable expectations — and that starts with setting meaningful and actionable KPIs (Key Performance Indicators). Well-crafted KPIs not only give the CEO a framework for success, but also create accountability and alignment with the organisation’s strategic goals.

Here’s how a Board Chair can go about establishing strong, actionable KPIs for a new CEO’s first year:

1. Begin with Strategic Alignment

Start by reviewing the organisation’s current strategic plan. Every KPI should map directly back to one or more strategic priorities. If the nonprofit is in a growth phase, KPIs might focus on revenue expansion, infrastructure, or staff development. If it’s a period of consolidation, the focus might be on sustainability or improving impact measurement.

Tip: Ask: What does success look like one year from now?

2. Engage the Full Board

While the Chair leads the process, input from the full Board ensures broad alignment and buy-in. Use board meetings or a dedicated performance subcommittee to discuss key organisational needs and how the CEO can drive results in year one.

3. Focus on Achievable, Measurable Goals

First-year KPIs should be ambitious but realistic. They must be specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART). Consider setting KPIs across a few key domains, such as:

  • Financial sustainability (e.g., meet or exceed fundraising targets)
  • Team leadership (e.g., complete an organisational structure review)
  • Stakeholder engagement (e.g., meet with top 20 donors and partners)
  • Strategic execution (e.g., develop a 3-year operational roadmap)
  • Board relations (e.g., conduct a successful board retreat or orientation)

4. Prioritise Learning and Culture

Remember, the first year is also about listening and learning. Include KPIs that encourage the CEO to understand organisational culture, staff dynamics, and community relationships. Examples include conducting a 90-day listening tour, initiating employee feedback loops, or engaging in DEI strategy development.

5. Build in Regular Check-Ins

Performance shouldn’t be evaluated once a year. Set quarterly or biannual checkpoints where the Chair and CEO meet to review progress, revisit priorities, and adjust KPIs as needed.

6. Document and Formalise

Once KPIs are agreed upon, document them clearly and include them in the CEO’s performance agreement. This transparency creates accountability for both the CEO and the Board.

Setting thoughtful KPIs is one of the most important ways a Board Chair can support a new CEO. It’s about setting the tone, defining success, and empowering the CEO to lead with clarity. Done well, it builds a strong foundation for trust, results, and long-term impact.

, , , , , , , ,

How a New CEO Can Make a Big Impact in the First 90 Days

New CEO

The first 90 days in a nonprofit CEO role can define a leader’s long-term success. It’s a period of intense observation, relationship building, and early wins. New CEOs stepping into mission-driven organisations must navigate unique dynamics — from donor relationships and governance responsibilities to community trust and limited resources.

Here are key ways a new CEO can make a meaningful impact in those critical early days:

1. Listen First, Lead Second

Start by learning — not just about programs and finances, but about culture, history, and people. Conduct listening tours with staff, Board members, donors, volunteers, and service recipients. Ask what’s working, what’s not, and what success would look like. This builds trust, surfaces valuable insights, and signals respect for the organisation’s legacy.

2. Clarify the Mission and Strategic Priorities

A clear understanding of the mission and current strategic plan helps the CEO align their work and decisions. Revisit the strategic plan with the Board and leadership team to identify priority areas for the next 6–12 months. If the organisation doesn’t have a strategic plan, consider initiating a light-touch planning process to set focus and direction.

3. Establish Strong Board Relationships

A productive CEO–Board relationship is foundational. Meet one-on-one with each Board member to understand their background, expectations, and aspirations for the organisation. Regular check-ins with the Board Chair and transparent communication set the tone for effective governance and support.

4. Communicate Early and Often

Internal and external stakeholders are paying close attention in the first few months. Use this time to clearly and confidently communicate your vision, values, and priorities. Staff town halls, donor updates, and community messages can help unify the organisation and reinforce momentum.

5. Assess Organisational Health

Review financials, staffing structures, technology, and fundraising performance. Work with the leadership team to identify any urgent risks, stalled projects, or resource gaps. Understanding internal systems early can prevent surprises down the line.

6. Secure a “New CEO Quick Win“

Identify and deliver on a small but meaningful improvement — whether it’s a new staff recognition program, an overdue policy update, or reactivating a donor relationship. Early wins demonstrate action and instill confidence.

7. Set Leadership Expectations and Culture

Articulate how you lead and what you value — whether it’s transparency, collaboration, innovation, or equity. Early behaviours set cultural expectations, so model the tone you want for the organisation.

In Summary

A nonprofit CEO’s first 90 days are a rare window of opportunity to inspire confidence, align teams, and lay the foundation for long-term success. By listening deeply, aligning to mission, and acting with intention, a new CEO can make a powerful early impact — one that sets the stage for bold progress and lasting change.

, , , , , , , ,

Executive Search Firms – A Step-by-Step Guide

Executive Search Firms

When a charitable organisation is preparing to hire a new Chief Executive Officer or other senior leader, the stakes are high. These individuals shape mission delivery, culture, and long-term sustainability. To ensure a successful outcome, many organisations turn to executive search firms for support. But engaging the right firm—and managing the process well—requires preparation, clarity, and oversight.

Here’s a step-by-step guide to help your organisation navigate the process of engaging an executive search firm for a senior leadership role.

Step 1: Define the Need and Objectives for Executive Search Firms

Before reaching out to executive search firms, your board or executive committee should agree on:

  • Why external support is needed
  • The goals of the search (e.g., replacing a retiring CEO, scaling the organisation, diversifying leadership)
  • The desired timeline
  • Budget allocation for the search

Clarity at this stage ensures a better fit between your organisation and the search partner.

Step 2: Draft and Distribute a Request for Proposal (RFP)

An RFP outlines what your organisation is looking for and invites search firms to submit proposals. Key sections include:

  • Organisational overview and mission
  • Position description or search scope
  • Services required (e.g., candidate sourcing, stakeholder interviews, psychometric testing)
  • Timeline and deadlines
  • Proposal submission requirements

Be specific—but flexible—so firms can suggest value-added approaches.

Step 3: Identify and Invite Qualified Search Firms

Create a shortlist of 3–6 reputable firms with:

  • Experience in the nonprofit or social purpose sector
  • Knowledge of the role type (e.g., CEO, fundraising, advocacy)
  • Demonstrated commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion
  • Proven ability to recruit nationally or globally if needed

Reach out directly or post your RFP publicly to encourage a diverse pool.

Step 4: Evaluate Proposals with a Clear Scoring Framework

Use a scoring matrix to compare proposals fairly. Key criteria to assess include:

  • Understanding of your mission and sector
  • Track record and references
  • Search methodology and timeline
  • Team experience and assigned personnel
  • Cost and value

Interview top candidates if needed to ensure cultural and strategic fit.

Step 5: Finalise the Contract and Expectations

Once a firm is selected:

  • Agree on the fee structure, milestones, and deliverables
  • Clarify roles (e.g., who’s managing communication with candidates?)
  • Confirm confidentiality protocols and conflict of interest provisions
  • Define expectations for stakeholder involvement and updates

Good contracts help prevent misunderstandings and ensure accountability.

Step 6: Support the Search Process

Even with a firm engaged, your organisation plays a key role:

  • Provide clear and consistent messaging to staff and stakeholders
  • Designate a point of contact from the board or HR
  • Ensure timely feedback on candidate profiles and interviews
  • Uphold a respectful and inclusive experience for all applicants

Step 7: Prepare for Onboarding and Transition

Once the successful candidate is appointed, the firm may assist with:

  • Negotiating terms
  • Communicating the appointment
  • Supporting onboarding and transition planning

Thoughtful onboarding improves retention and ensures your investment in the search pays off.

Final Thought

Partnering with executive search firms can be a strategic and transformative step for a charitable organisation, especially when approached with clarity and care. By following a structured process, you not only increase your chances of hiring the right leader but also strengthen your organisation’s governance and long-term success.

, , , , , , , ,

Executive Search Firm engagement is a must for a CEO-Level Searches

Hiring a new CEO is one of the most consequential decisions a charitable organisation will make. The Chief Executive Officer plays a pivotal role in shaping vision, setting culture, and guiding the organisation toward mission-driven impact. Given the complexity, importance, and long-term implications of this leadership transition, engaging an executive search firm can be a strategic move—one that delivers both immediate and lasting benefits.

1. Broader, Deeper Reach into the Talent Market

Executive search firms bring expansive networks and sourcing tools that go far beyond posting job ads. They are equipped to identify, approach, and engage passive candidates—those not actively seeking new roles but who may be perfect fits. This expanded reach is especially valuable for charities seeking candidates with specialised experience in fundraising, certification, advocacy, or global nonprofit leadership.

2. Expertise in Nonprofit and Mission-Driven Leadership

The best search firms understand the unique demands of the nonprofit sector. They know that effective leadership in a charity requires more than corporate experience—it demands emotional intelligence, a commitment to ethical governance, stakeholder diplomacy, and a strong connection to the mission. Search partners bring insights from similar organisations and can ensure alignment in values, style, and strategy.

3. Objectivity and Confidentiality

Executive transitions can be sensitive—particularly if they involve an outgoing founder or a long-tenured CEO. An external firm brings a neutral, confidential approach to the process, ensuring fairness, discretion, and professionalism throughout. This helps avoid internal bias and protects relationships with staff, donors, and partners during the transition period.

4. Support for the Board and Search Committee

Most charity boards are composed of volunteers with full-time responsibilities outside the organisation. A search firm helps structure and manage the recruitment process—defining timelines, drafting candidate profiles, assessing applicants, and facilitating interviews. This allows board members to focus on decision-making, not administration.

5. Ensuring Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion

Quality search firms have embedded DEI practices and actively work to broaden the candidate pool to include diverse voices and perspectives. For charities that want to lead with equity, this support is essential in avoiding blind spots and ensuring inclusive recruitment.

6. Improved Fit and Reduced Risk of Turnover

Search firms use competency-based interviewing, reference checking, and often psychometric testing to ensure the final candidate is not only qualified, but culturally aligned. This improves long-term fit, which is critical in the nonprofit sector where CEO turnover can destabilise operations and erode donor confidence.

Final Thoughts

While hiring an executive search firm is an investment, the cost of a poor leadership hire is far greater. For charitable organisations navigating leadership transition, especially at the CEO level, partnering with an experienced search firm isn’t a luxury—it’s a strategy that protects your mission, people, and future impact.

, , , , , , ,

Redundancy: The Consequences of Avoiding Performance Management

In every organisation, staff performance varies—and occasionally, it falters. How leadership responds to underperformance, however, defines not just outcomes for individuals, but also the organisation’s culture, reputation, and sustainability. In some workplaces, underperformance is met not with support or accountability, but with a restructuring or redundancy process that quietly removes the problem. While it may seem like a clean solution, replacing performance management with redundancy is a costly, avoidant, and often ethically questionable path.

Let’s explore why.

1. Redundancy Undermines Trust in Leadership

When redundancies are used as a proxy for managing underperformance, staff quickly notice—and morale suffers. Colleagues see roles eliminated not because they’re no longer needed, but because someone wasn’t performing and leadership chose not to address it head-on. This damages trust. Staff begin to question whether their jobs are safe, whether feedback is honest, and whether transparency really exists. Trust, once eroded, is difficult to rebuild.

2. It Sends the Wrong Cultural Message

Avoiding direct conversations about performance tells the team: we don’t do accountability here. Instead of building a culture of continuous improvement, coaching, and professional growth, it builds one of silence, avoidance, and fear. Team members are less likely to take risks, ask for feedback, or raise concerns. High performers may disengage if they see poor performance tolerated—until it’s suddenly removed with no warning.

3. It Fails the Underperforming Employee

Redundancy deprives the employee of the opportunity to improve. With a well-structured performance management plan, they could have gained clarity, coaching, and a chance to meet expectations. Many people don’t realise they’re underperforming until they’re told clearly and given support. Redundancy robs them of that chance—and robs leadership of the opportunity to retain a potentially valuable team member.

4. It Can Be Legally and Financially Risky

Redundancy laws (especially in Australia) are clear: a role must be genuinely no longer required. Using redundancy to avoid performance management exposes an organisation to legal challenges, reputational damage, and financial penalties. It’s a short-term fix that can result in long-term cost. Performance management, on the other hand, provides documentation, fairness, and procedural rigor.

5. It Avoids Building Leadership Capability

Managing underperformance is difficult—but it’s part of the job of being a leader. When leaders shortcut the process through restructures, they miss opportunities to build essential skills: coaching, giving feedback, resolving conflict, and building high-performing teams. Avoidance now creates leadership gaps later.

6. It Undermines Strategic Workforce Planning

Redundancies that are performance-driven rather than role-driven can distort strategic workforce planning. Roles are lost not because they’re unnecessary but because someone struggled in the role. This can leave gaps in critical functions, misaligned structures, and unnecessary recruitment costs down the line.

What Should Leadership Do Instead?

  • Set clear expectations early and revisit them regularly.
  • Provide timely feedback, both affirming and constructive.
  • Create performance improvement plans that are supportive, realistic, and time-bound.
  • Train managers on how to have courageous conversations.
  • Recognise and reward improvement and effort.

When a role is truly no longer needed, redundancy is appropriate. But when a person is underperforming, the right course is not removal—it’s responsible, fair, and transparent performance management.

Leadership isn’t just about results—it’s about how those results are achieved. By confronting underperformance directly and fairly, leaders not only strengthen individuals but build a resilient, ethical, and high-performing workplace. Redundancy is a tool for organisational change—not a substitute for responsibility.

, , , , , ,

How Staff Can Navigate Leadership Resistance to Change

Change is rarely easy—and when you hear the phrase “we’ve always done it that way” from leadership, it can be especially discouraging. In many organisations, particularly in the nonprofit sector where traditions, history, and legacy run deep, resistance to change is not uncommon. But if you’re a staff member trying to drive innovation, improve processes, or respond to shifting community needs, this mindset can become a major roadblock.

So how do you respond professionally and productively when leadership seems stuck in the past? Here are some approaches that can help you move the conversation forward.

1. Understand the Fear Behind the Resistance

Often, “we’ve always done it that way” is less about the status quo and more about fear—fear of risk, failure, or the unknown. Change can feel threatening, especially when it challenges practices that have brought success in the past. Acknowledge that fear respectfully. This creates empathy and opens space for dialogue, not confrontation.

2. Lead with Evidence, Not Emotion

Data can be a powerful ally. If you’re advocating for a new approach, bring examples, benchmarking data, or case studies from peer organisations. Show how similar changes have delivered results elsewhere. For example:

“Other nonprofits our size who’ve adopted CRM-integrated donation forms saw a 25% increase in conversion rates.”

Facts shift mindsets better than frustration.

Leadership is more likely to listen when the change is clearly aligned with the organisation’s goals. Reframe your idea as a mission-enabler, not a disruption:

“This shift will allow us to reach more people experiencing housing insecurity with faster support.”

When change is presented as a path to greater impact, it’s harder to ignore.

4. Start Small: Pilot, Prototype, Prove

If you’re facing outright resistance, don’t try to overhaul the system all at once. Instead, suggest a small-scale pilot or prototype to demonstrate the potential:

“Can we trial this with one campaign before committing organisation-wide?”

This minimises perceived risk and builds confidence through early wins.

5. Frame Change as a Continuation, Not a Rejection

Sometimes resistance stems from the fear that change means everything done previously was wrong. Counter that by affirming what’s worked—and positioning your idea as an evolution, not a repudiation:

“We’ve done great work under the current model. This is about building on that foundation to stay relevant and effective in a changing environment.”

6. Engage Allies and Champions

Change rarely happens alone. Find others within your team or network who share your vision and can support your case. Better still, find a champion within leadership—someone more open to innovation—who can advocate with you from the inside.

7. Keep the Conversation Open and Professional

Avoid passive aggression or workplace grumbling. Stay respectful, clear, and focused on solutions over blame. Document your ideas and revisit them at the right time—sometimes the context or urgency shifts, and ideas that were rejected once gain new traction.

Final Thoughts: Persistence with Patience

Institutional change takes time, especially in mission-driven environments. If you’re encountering the “we’ve always done it that way” mentality, you’re not alone—but you’re also in a position to be a catalyst for meaningful evolution. Approach resistance with empathy, bring evidence, align your goals with the mission, and be ready to prove your case through action.

Progress often begins with a simple question:
“What if we tried it this way, just once?”

, , , , , , ,

Supplier Partnerships: Best Practices for Nonprofits Working with Suppliers

In the nonprofit world, partnerships are essential—not only with donors and community stakeholders, but also with the supplier partners who help deliver everything from fundraising campaigns to event production, IT systems, training, marketing, and more.

While suppliers may not be part of your team on paper, the reality is: when nonprofits and suppliers work well together, great things happen. Deliverables are smoother, relationships are stronger, and your mission is better supported.

Here’s how to make those relationships work—and why treating your suppliers like true partners pays off in the long run.

1. Start with Clear Expectations

From the outset, be transparent about what you need, when you need it, and what success looks like. A well-written brief that includes timelines, budget range, audience insights, and deliverables is one of the best gifts you can give a supplier.

Best Practice:
Hold a kick-off meeting and invite your supplier into the strategic conversation. They’ll do a better job when they understand why the work matters—not just what needs to be done.

2. Respect Their Time and Process

Suppliers are professionals with multiple clients and projects on the go. Just like your internal team, they have workflows, schedules, and deadlines to juggle.

Best Practice:
Avoid last-minute requests where possible. Build in adequate lead time for approvals, feedback, and iterations. And if your internal processes are likely to delay things (e.g., board sign-offs), communicate this early.

3. Be Honest About Budget and Constraints

Nonprofits often operate under tight budgets, and good suppliers understand that. But transparency is key. Being upfront about what you can afford—and what you can’t—helps your supplier propose realistic options that still meet your goals.

Best Practice:
If you’re working with limited funds, ask your supplier to help you prioritise deliverables or find phased approaches. You might be surprised how creative they can be when they understand the full picture.

4. Foster Two-Way Communication

Treat your suppliers as collaborators, not vendors. Welcome their ideas and feedback, and be open to suggestions that might improve the final result—even if it challenges your initial thinking.

Best Practice:
Set up regular check-ins during the project timeline. Use these to review progress, troubleshoot, and adjust as needed. This keeps everyone aligned and reduces the chance of unpleasant surprises.

5. Give Constructive Feedback—Promptly

If something isn’t quite right, let them know—respectfully and quickly. Delayed or vague feedback can slow down a project and frustrate both sides.

Best Practice:
Frame feedback around the brief and objectives. Be specific, and where possible, offer examples of what you like or don’t like.

6. Pay Suppliers Promptly and Professionally

Suppliers are businesses too. Late payments can strain relationships and make suppliers hesitant to work with you again.

Best Practice:
Agree on payment terms up front—and honor them. If delays are unavoidable, communicate early and clearly about when payment will be made.

7. Acknowledge and Celebrate Supplier Contributions

Suppliers are often behind the scenes—but that doesn’t mean their efforts go unnoticed. A simple thank you, a testimonial, or a public shout-out can go a long way in showing appreciation.

Best Practice:
If a supplier goes above and beyond, nominate them for a supplier excellence award or refer them to others in your network. Building goodwill means your best partners are more likely to say yes the next time you need them.

Conclusion

Supplier relationships aren’t just transactional—they’re partnerships that can have a lasting impact on your nonprofit’s success. By communicating clearly, planning ahead, and building trust, you create a foundation for mutual respect, quality outcomes, and a more sustainable path to fulfilling your mission.

Remember: when you treat your suppliers like strategic allies, everyone wins—especially the communities you serve.

, , , , , , , ,

Lack of Planning – The Ripple Effect of Last-Minute Requests

Brunout

In the fast-paced world of nonprofit work and project delivery, last-minute requests can feel inevitable. Emergencies happen. Priorities shift. But when “urgent” becomes the norm rather than the exception, it can take a toll—not just on your internal team, but also on the external partners and suppliers you rely on. Planning ahead is a leadership skill and exercising this skill makes it easier on everyone.

It’s easy to forget that our colleagues and collaborators are juggling multiple responsibilities and clients too. Every last-minute request can create a ripple effect, causing stress, missed deadlines, and lower-quality outcomes. In this blog post, we explore the real impact of last-minute requests—and why planning ahead is a simple but powerful way to show respect and build stronger working relationships.

1. Burnout Isn’t Just an Internal Problem

When internal team members are regularly asked to drop everything for a last-minute task, it chips away at morale. It sends the message that their time and workload are less important than the immediate crisis. Over time, this kind of pressure leads to burnout, mistakes, and disengagement.

The same goes for your external suppliers—designers, printers, consultants, tech support, and more. They have schedules, client commitments, and production workflows. A sudden request doesn’t just demand their time—it disrupts it.

2. You Compromise Quality When You Rush

Creative and strategic work takes time. When you rush a job—especially complex or creative work—you risk getting an outcome that’s “just good enough” instead of exceptional.

Your external partners want to deliver their best. When they’re given time to plan, review, and polish their work, the result is a better product for everyone. But if they’re constantly firefighting on your behalf, their capacity to deliver high-quality work erodes.

3. It Can Cost More—In Money and Relationships

Last-minute work often incurs rush fees. And even if it doesn’t, it can strain professional goodwill. If you’re consistently putting pressure on your suppliers to turn things around quickly, it may make them hesitant to prioritise your work in the future—or work with you at all.

Respectful lead times help you maintain strong relationships with trusted suppliers. It positions you as a reliable client—one they’ll go the extra mile for when it truly matters.

4. Planning Ahead is Not Just About Deadlines—It’s About Respect

Every professional relationship, whether internal or external, is built on mutual respect. Giving people time to do their jobs properly communicates that you value their skills and their time. It creates space for collaboration, constructive feedback, and shared ownership of the outcome.

When we rush, we often default to “telling” rather than “asking”—undermining the collaborative spirit we need to succeed.

5. Planning Ahead Is a Leadership Skill

Good planning isn’t just a project management function—it’s a leadership trait. Teams that plan ahead foster trust, reduce stress, and deliver consistently better results. They’re better able to adapt when true emergencies arise, because they aren’t already operating at full capacity under constant urgency.

By planning ahead, you help everyone—your team, your partners, and yourself—stay focused, effective, and motivated.

How to Do Better

  • Set clear timelines: Build in buffer time for feedback, approvals, and potential delays.
  • Communicate early: Even if a task isn’t urgent yet, give your partners a heads-up so they can plan.
  • Clarify priorities: If something is urgent, explain why and be transparent about timelines.
  • Respect working hours: Avoid sending work with short deadlines at the end of the day or right before weekends.
  • Debrief and reflect: If something became last-minute due to internal delays, review what happened and improve the process.

In Summary

Last-minute requests don’t just impact deadlines—they affect people. Whether it’s your internal team or your external partners, everyone deserves the time and space to do their best work. Planning ahead is one of the simplest ways to demonstrate professionalism, foster trust, and improve outcomes across the board.

So next time you’re tempted to say, “Can we get this by tomorrow?”—pause, and ask: How can we make this easier on everyone involved?

Because thoughtful planning isn’t just efficient—it’s respectful. And that’s good for business, good for morale, and good for impact.

, , , , , , ,

Nonprofits Must Continue to Lead DEI Initiatives

In the first weeks of the Trump administration, President Trump has made moves to roll back diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, creating uncertainty for organisations committed to fostering inclusive environments. Despite these challenges, nonprofit organisations must remain steadfast in their DEI efforts. The very nature of nonprofit work—serving diverse communities, advocating for marginalised groups, and striving for social equity—demands an unwavering commitment to diversity and inclusion. Here’s why nonprofits should continue prioritising DEI, regardless of political headwinds.

1. Upholding Core Values

Most nonprofit organisations exist to serve the public good, often focusing on underrepresented or underserved communities. Rolling back DEI initiatives would contradict their fundamental missions. Equity and inclusion ensure that nonprofits are truly addressing systemic barriers and fostering environments where all individuals have equal access to opportunities and resources. By maintaining DEI efforts, nonprofits reinforce their commitment to fairness and justice.

2. Strengthening Community Trust and Engagement

Communities expect nonprofits to be inclusive and representative of the people they serve. Scaling back DEI efforts can erode trust and weaken engagement with key stakeholders. A diverse and equitable nonprofit not only attracts a broader base of support but also fosters deeper connections with beneficiaries, donors, and volunteers. Demonstrating an ongoing commitment to DEI reassures communities that their voices matter and that the nonprofit is invested in long-term, meaningful change.

3. Enhancing Organisational Effectiveness

Research consistently shows that diverse and inclusive organisations are more innovative, resilient, and effective. Nonprofits that embrace DEI can tap into a wider range of perspectives, leading to better decision-making and problem-solving. Moreover, fostering an inclusive work environment improves employee satisfaction and retention, reducing turnover costs and ensuring a more stable and dedicated workforce.

4. Navigating the Changing Landscape

While federal policies may shift, the broader social and business landscape continues to prioritise DEI. Many private foundations, corporations, and donors still consider diversity and inclusion essential criteria for funding decisions. Nonprofits that deprioritise DEI may find themselves at a disadvantage when seeking grants, partnerships, and sponsorships. Staying the course ensures that organisations remain competitive and aligned with the evolving expectations of funders and partners.

5. Standing in Solidarity with Marginalised Groups

At a time when certain communities feel increasingly vulnerable due to policy changes, nonprofits have a moral obligation to stand firm in their support. Rolling back DEI initiatives sends the wrong message to those who rely on nonprofit services. Instead, organisations should double down on their commitment to advocacy, equitable hiring, and inclusive programming to ensure that the most marginalised populations continue to receive the support they need.

6. Leading by Example

Nonprofits play a crucial role in shaping societal norms and influencing public discourse. By continuing their DEI efforts, they set a powerful example for other organisations, businesses, and communities. Leadership in diversity and inclusion can inspire change beyond the nonprofit sector, demonstrating that a commitment to equity is not just a political stance but a fundamental principle of ethical and effective service.

While government rollbacks on DEI initiatives may create challenges, they should not dictate the priorities of nonprofit organisations. Now more than ever, nonprofits must reaffirm their commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion to maintain credibility, effectiveness, and impact. By staying the course, nonprofits not only support marginalised communities but also strengthen their own sustainability and leadership in creating a more just and inclusive society.

How is your nonprofit reinforcing its DEI commitment in the face of changing policies? Share your thoughts and experiences in the comments below!