A Positive Reference for a Poor Performer Harms the Fundraising Sector

In the nonprofit world, references carry significant weight. They’re often seen not just as a testament to a candidate’s skills and experience, but as an endorsement of their integrity, commitment, and suitability to steward donor relationships and drive mission-critical revenue. That’s why giving a positive reference for a poor performer or problematic staff member—even with good intentions—is not just misleading. It’s a disservice to the entire fundraising sector.
Fundraising Is Built on Trust
Fundraisers are stewards of donor relationships, financial resources, and public trust. When someone has demonstrated poor performance, a pattern of unreliability, or even unethical behavior, providing them with a glowing reference enables them to carry those issues into another organisation—often unchecked.
This not only puts future donors at risk but undermines the confidence of leadership and boards in their fundraising staff, which can have long-term consequences for the profession’s credibility.
It Erodes Professional Standards
The fundraising sector is increasingly professionalised, with credentialing, codes of ethics, and best practice benchmarks. When we overlook performance issues and recommend someone “just to help them move on,” we dilute the very standards we’re trying to uphold.
References should reflect a candidate’s ability to do the job well and act with integrity—not simply serve as a pass to their next paycheck.
The Cycle of Dysfunction Continues
Problematic behavior that goes unaddressed—poor communication, missed targets, toxic conduct—often becomes a pattern that is repeated across organisations. Leaders who fail to be honest in references contribute to a cycle where future managers must deal with inherited issues, often at the expense of team morale and donor relationships.
Honesty Isn’t Cruelty—It’s Responsibility
Giving an honest reference doesn’t mean being vindictive. It means providing balanced, factual feedback:
- Acknowledge areas of strength
- Share development needs or limitations
- State whether you’d rehire the person (a telling question)
It is possible to be both kind and truthful—especially if it helps another organisation make an informed decision.
The Bottom Line
The sector is too important—and the stakes too high—to paper over problems for the sake of convenience or collegiality. As leaders, we must protect the integrity of the fundraising profession by being courageous enough to give honest references. It’s not just about one hire—it’s about setting a standard for every hire that follows.
You must be logged in to post a comment.